花千骨

看到这个标题，可能很多兄弟都会震惊到。         Two Bilibili (Chinese video-sharing platform) users were found guilty of copyright infringement and were sentenced to one year and two months and one year in prison, respectively, both with probation. Photo: Courtesy of miHoYo
A criminal case involving information leaks related to miHoYo, the developer of Genshin Impact, has reached its first-instance verdict. Two Bilibili (Chinese video-sharing platform) users were found guilty of copyright infringement and were sentenced to one year and two months and one year in prison, respectively, both with probation. It is the first criminal game leak case under a new judicial interpretation issued by China's top judicial authorities, according to miHoYo.
The infringing videos uploaded by Su and Wu received more than 600,000 and 300,000 views, respectively, exceeding the criminal prosecution thresholds stipulated under the judicial interpretation. The court therefore found that the two individuals met the criteria for criminal prosecution and handed down guilty verdicts.
During routine monitoring, in July 2025, miHoYo discovered that Su and Wu had repeatedly uploaded gameplay videos featuring unreleased versions of miHoYo titles, including Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail and Zenless Zone Zero, without any authorization from the company. The videos, widely circulated within gaming communities, exposed unreleased characters, skill animations and other content that had not yet been officially introduced to players,  miHoYo noted.
After discovering the alleged violations, miHoYo reported the case to the police in accordance with legal procedures. Following an investigation, the police arrested the two individuals involved. 
The case was publicly heard and the verdict was delivered on April 24, 2026. The court ruled that Su was to be sentenced to one year and two months in prison with probation, while Wu was sentenced to one year of detention with probation, according to miHoYo.
Guo Hao, a Beijing-based lawyer, told the Global Times on Thursday that a key significance of the case lies in its further clarification of how game leak cases can be assessed under the Criminal Law.
"In the past, game leaks were more often handled through civil infringement claims or breach-of-contract disputes. In this case, however, the court did not simply determine liability based on whether content was released ahead of schedule," Guo said. "Instead, it considered factors including the scale of dissemination, the nature of the leaked content and the impact caused, and determined that the conduct met the prosecution threshold for the crime of copyright infringement."
Similar game leak incidents have also occurred overseas in recent years. In October 2024, The Pokemon Company suffered a data breach that resulted in large amounts of internal information being leaked online, including employees' personal information, according to overseas media reports. Dubbed the "Teraleak" by the gaming community, the incident was reportedly one of the largest game-related leaks in recent years. The leaked materials reportedly included game source codes, details of future projects and other internal information, according to Nintendo Life, a UK-based gaming news outlet.
Earlier, Nintendo had pursued legal action over the leak of a Pokemon Sword and Shield strategy guide in 2019. According to gaming website Polygon, The Pokémon Company later reached a settlement with the two individuals responsible, who were required to pay $150,000 each in damages.
"From a player's perspective, there is a clear difference between game leaks and normal game discussions," Lu, a member from the Steam gaming community, told the Global Times on Thursday. "Players discussing and analyzing officially released information is part of gaming culture, but obtaining and spreading unreleased content through unauthorized channels can harm the efforts of developers and affect the experience of the entire player community."
Such concerns are also shared by game developers, who view unreleased content as a key part of their creative and commercial plans.
A post by miHoYo on its online account specifies that every unreleased frame of game content represents the design and refinement efforts of its creative teams, while also carrying players' expectations for upcoming updates. Unauthorized early exposure of such content not only infringes upon miHoYo's copyright interests, but also takes away the surprise that players should have when experiencing new content for the first time.
。但这不是杜撰，不是愚人节玩笑，更不是AI，而是发生在昨天的真事儿。

B | 亚洲篮坛爆出惊天冷门，世界排名108的蒙古男篮，在热身赛中以67比65压哨绝杀排名高居22位的日本男篮，拿下队史对阵日本男篮的首场胜利。写到这里，一些朋友或许就“习惯性开骂”了。大伙需要明确的是，日本并未派出八村垒、河村勇辉这套世界杯主力阵容，像霍金森和渡边也没打，他们出战的是为亚运会备战的二队。尽管如此，他们还是有老熟人：34岁的归化内线亚历克斯-柯克。也有日本的00后未来重点培养对象，川岛悠翔。二队班底，即便如此，两支队伍纸面实力依旧差距悬殊，赛前几乎没有人看好蒙古能够带走胜利。此役，征战NCAA联赛的蒙古核心球员迈克-沙拉夫贾姆茨五人制国家队首秀即封神，全场狂砍33分14篮板7助攻2盖帽，并贡献制胜绝杀上篮。

C | 甭管日本是几队，咱的锋线什么什么时候能拿沙拉夫贾姆茨这个数据？今天帝哥不是要拿蒙古的历史性胜利来贬低中国男篮，这很没有必要。但想分享的是，如果你了解蒙古篮球这些年的发展就会明白，这场胜利不是偶然。

D | 别人的进步原因，是不是能找到一定的借鉴意义？咱作为球迷能不能得到一些思考的价值？我认为都是有的。蒙古这个国家，人口总数350万左右，还没深圳龙岗人多。他们的经济体量有限、体育基础薄弱，世代以游牧、搏克、赛马为传统体育项目。在家庭条件有限的情况下，他们的篮协制定了优先发展三人篮球、以三人篮球反哺五人制篮球的差异化弯道超车战略。所以这些年来，蒙古三人篮球国家队稳居世界前列，多次斩获亚洲杯、巡回赛冠军，是亚洲三人篮球的标杆队伍。三人篮球场地更小、节奏更快，项目的特殊性让蒙古人强悍的对抗、灵活的移动、顽强的拼抢优势彻底释放。

E | 出成绩了，就会有很浅显的道理：社会关注度、资金投入、政策支持持续增加，原本发展滞后的五人篮球，也会迎来发展机遇。蒙古篮球走的是什么道路？总结来说，是精英化和国际化。以他们的头号球星迈克-沙拉夫贾姆茨为例，他是蒙古国历史首位NCAA一级联盟全额奖学金球员、首位登陆NBA夏季联赛的球员。出生地为美国，父母均为蒙古籍，两岁时随家人返回蒙古国乌兰巴托。他的父亲现在还是蒙古篮协主席。沙拉夫贾姆茨16岁的时候，就以队长身份率领蒙古U18国青队征战乌兰巴托三人篮球世界杯，带领球队斩获世界第六的优异成绩。

F | 打出名堂以后，他就开启了美高和NCAA生涯。上赛季，大四的沙拉夫贾姆茨在南卡罗莱纳大学坐稳了主力，场均可以得到10.9分5.6篮板的生涯最佳数据。

G | 咱该说不说，中国男篮目前都没有一位球员在NCAA打出这个水准。所以，23岁的沙拉瓦贾姆茨回归，直接补齐了蒙古国家队最大短板：球星。如果中国男篮有球员打出他这个数据，国内这些媒体和专家，不得把他吹捧进NBA？他代表魔术打过夏联。

H | 他用亲身经历验证了小国篮球差异化突围的可行性。人口少、基础弱的体育小国，无需照搬传统强国的本土培养模式。通过本土发掘天赋、海外高阶淬炼、国际赛事打磨的模式，能够培育出好球员，带动国家队整体实力跃升。通俗讲， 就是借鸡生蛋。

I | 你指望蒙古国的本土联赛培养出沙拉瓦贾姆茨这种水平的球员？放弃吧！如今击败日本，印证了蒙古五人制篮球的崛起势头，也诠释了海外育才模式的成功...最后多说两句，如果大家了解足球你就会知道，国足假如有一天如果输给老挝，也别意外。他们现在U12的年龄段，有一支很强的队伍，最近来中国参加董路发起的2034杯小学生足球大会。老挝的发展模式是什么？依然是精英化和国际化。把好苗子筛选出来，然后送出去欧洲，多打高水平比赛，一定会有进步的。